Dota 2: Virtus.pro vs TEAM VISION (BO3) - The International Europe Closed Qualifier Playoffs

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

This market covers the Upper Bracket semifinal 2 in The International Europe Closed Qualifier Playoffs, where Virtus.pro faces TEAM VISION in a Best-of-3 series scheduled for 3:00 PM ET on 25 June 2026. The crowd-implied probability of 0% YES for Virtus.pro reflects a stark divergence from historical precedents where qualifier upsets are rare but not impossible; notably, in past TI qualifiers, teams with sub-40% winrates over six months have occasionally secured victories against higher-ranked opponents when facing tactical unfamiliarity, though such cases typically involve a 10–15% probability floor rather than absolute zero.

TEAM VISION’s current form is the primary catalyst: they hold a 73% winrate over the last month, including wins against rank 4 and rank 7 squads, and boast a perfect 2–0 head-to-head record against Virtus.pro this year, granting them decisive tactical familiarity [1]. Conversely, Virtus.pro’s 37% winrate over the past half-year signals a prolonged slump, compounded by zero historical wins versus TEAM VISION and a poor DreamLeague showing that raises map-strategy concerns [1]. Traders should monitor any lineup changes or suspension announcements, as TEAM VISION’s core roster (Satanic, 9Class, Noticed, Dukalis, No[o]ne) remains stable, while Virtus.pro’s recent roster includes Aybek Tokayev and Artem Melnick, both joined in March 2025, with no recent inactive player updates [3]. Strafe users predict a close match with 56.8% favouring Virtus.pro, suggesting the 0% market price may be an overreaction to form metrics rather than a true reflection of matchup dynamics [2].

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.