Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via World Cup 2026 Favorites) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
28% | 72% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
28% | 72% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Fernando Tatis Jr. | 28% |
| Shohei Ohtani | 24% |
| Gunnar Henderson | 21% |
| Ben Rice | 6% |
| Aaron Judge | 4% |
| Bobby Witt Jr. | 3% |
| Corbin Carroll | 3% |
| Kyle Schwarber | 2% |
| José Ramírez | 2% |
| Zach Neto | 2% |
| Juan Soto | 1% |
| Mookie Betts | 1% |
| Dansby Swanson | 1% |
| Luke Wood | 1% |
| Yordan Alvarez | 1% |
| Francisco Lindor | 1% |
| Julio Rodríguez | 1% |
| Mike Trout | 1% |
| Byron Buxton | 1% |
| Randy Arozarena | 1% |
| José Bell | 1% |
| Cal Raleigh | 0% |
| George Springer | 0% |
| Brett Turang | 0% |
| Carlos Correa | 0% |
| Player A | 0% |
| Player C | 0% |
| Player E | 0% |
| Player G | 0% |
| Player I | 0% |
| Player K | 0% |
| Player M | 0% |
| Player O | 0% |
| Player Q | 0% |
| Player S | 0% |
| Player U | 0% |
| Player W | 0% |
| Player Y | 0% |
| Player AA | 0% |
| Player AC | 0% |
| Player AE | 0% |
| Player AG | 0% |
| Player AI | 0% |
| Player AK | 0% |
| Player AM | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| Elly De La Cruz | 0% |
| Drake Baldwin | 0% |
| Jose Altuve | 0% |
| Player B | 0% |
| Player D | 0% |
| Player F | 0% |
| Player H | 0% |
| Player J | 0% |
| Player L | 0% |
| Player N | 0% |
| Player P | 0% |
| Player R | 0% |
| Player T | 0% |
| Player V | 0% |
| Player X | 0% |
| Player Z | 0% |
| Player AB | 0% |
| Player AD | 0% |
| Player AF | 0% |
| Player AH | 0% |
| Player AJ | 0% |
| Player AL | 0% |
| Player AN | 0% |
Market context
The 2026 MLB regular season is nearing its conclusion, with the market betting on which player will accumulate the most runs before the settlement window closes on 28 September. At a current crowd-implied probability of 24% for the "YES" outcome, traders are weighing whether the statistical leader will hold or if a late-season surge by a rival will overturn the standings. Runs are heavily correlated with batting average and on-base percentage, making players who consistently avoid strikeouts and reach base frequently the most likely contenders.
Historically, the player leading in runs in mid-June has often retained the title, but 2026 presents a volatile contest. Kyle Schwarber currently leads in home runs with 78, while Yordan Alvarez tops the list with 83, suggesting both are prime candidates to convert power into runs through high on-base percentages [1][6]. In comparable seasons, players with over 80 home runs and an on-base percentage above 0.370 have dominated the runs category, yet Schwarber’s lower average compared to Alvarez creates a tie-breaker risk if totals converge [3][6].
Traders must monitor late-season line-up announcements and injury reports, as a single missed game can alter run totals significantly. Recent news from ESPN confirms Otto Lopez leads in batting average, while Nick Kurtz tops RBI, indicating potential run-scoring catalysts beyond the top home-run hitters [3]. With the season ending in late September, any suspension or injury to Schwarber or Alvarez could shift the probability line, so daily updates from official MLB sources are essential for accurate positioning [4].
Methodology
Football-specific comparison page for MLB: Runs Leader. Polymarket's live quote (Polygon order book) plus platform attributes for the three reference venues. Sports markets reward liquidity — Polymarket and Betfair are materially deeper than Kalshi (US-focused) or Manifold (play-money).
Resolution & payout
Sports markets typically settle on official final-whistle plus league confirmation. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle with a source URL per contract — usually official league data feeds or ESPN/Soccerway. Two-hour dispute window, then smart-contract payout in USDC.
FAQ
- Are prediction markets better than sports betting?
- Prediction markets tend toward tighter odds than bookmakers because they use peer-to-peer exchange rather than bookmaker margin. On major matches, Polymarket quotes typically sit 2-5% closer to the true probability model than bet365 or DraftKings.
- When do sports markets resolve?
- Typically within hours of the official final whistle. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle with source URLs pointing at official league data feeds — e.g. the Premier League for EPL markets, UEFA for Champions League, FIFA for World Cup.
- Can I bet on individual matches?
- Yes, Polymarket lists every major Premier League / Champions League / World Cup match as its own market. Liquidity varies — top matches like El Clásico or a semi-final often have six-figure pools, lower-league games closer to three-figure.
- How fast do sports winnings settle?
- Once the official league outcome is logged in the UMA Oracle (typically 1-2 hours after the final whistle), Polymarket's smart contract triggers USDC payout. To your wallet within minutes.
- What's the difference between match odds and outright odds?
- Match odds cover a single game ("Bayern beats BVB"). Outright odds are long-term aggregates ("Bayern wins the league"). Outright markets have deeper liquidity; match markets have faster resolution.
Trade MLB: Runs Leader on World Cup 2026 Favorites
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →