Panama vs. England - Exact Score

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The upcoming FIFA World Cup Group L fixture between Panama and England at New York/New Jersey Stadium on 27 June 2026 is a decisive match for both sides, with England seeking to top the group and Panama aiming to exit with a positive result after narrow defeats to Ghana and Croatia. The crowd-implied 3% probability for an exact score outcome reflects the stark contrast in form: England, the group leader with four points, has shown attacking potency with a 4–2 win over Croatia, while Panama, despite defensive resilience in the first half of their matches, has lost all five prior World Cup games and remains missing key player Adalberto Carrasquilla due to injury [1][2].

Historically, such low probabilities for exact scores in mismatched World Cup games often mirror cases like England’s 6–1 victory over Panama in 2018, their largest World Cup win, where the exact score was heavily traded before the match but resolved to a single outcome with minimal variance [2]. Comparable scenarios include Mexico’s 2014 shutout of Croatia, where defensive discipline and limited shot volume created a narrow range of likely scores, much like Panama’s 50 crosses and 32 total shots in 2026, which suggest a low-scoring, controlled game rather than a chaotic one [1][2].

Traders should monitor final line-up announcements for England, particularly Declan Rice’s chance creation (ten so far) and any potential suspensions or fatigue issues, as well as Panama’s defensive setup given their tendency to reach halftime without conceding [1][2]. Key dependencies include weather conditions at MetLife Stadium and any late injury updates, with Sky Sports confirming England’s recent form includes a 0–0 draw with Ghana and a 4–2 win over Croatia, indicating tactical flexibility that could shift the exact score line [3]. No major suspensions have been reported, but Carrasquilla’s absence remains a critical factor for Panama’s attacking options [1].

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.