Curaçao vs. Côte d'Ivoire - Total Corners

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The underlying event is the FIFA World Cup 2026 Group E match between Curaçao and Côte d'Ivoire, which concluded on Thursday, 25 June with Côte d'Ivoire winning 2–0. This game has already been played, meaning the prediction market for “Total Corners” is settled on a known outcome: Côte d'Ivoire advanced to the knockout stage for the first time, while Curaçao, the tournament debutants, were eliminated. The crowd-implied probability of 100% YES reflects the certainty that the total corners threshold has been met, as the match result is final and verified across multiple official sources including FIFA and ESPN[1][2][4].

Historically, matches where one team dominates possession and attacks early—such as Côte d'Ivoire’s 558 completed passes against Curaçao, their highest in a World Cup match—tend to generate high corner counts due to sustained pressure and defensive blocks[5]. Comparable knockout-stage qualifiers from past World Cups show that teams securing their first-ever advancement often maintain aggressive line-ups, leading to frequent corner opportunities. In this case, Nicolas Pépé’s double and Côte d'Ivoire’s clinical finishing underscored their control, a pattern that consistently correlates with elevated corner totals in elite football[2][4].

Traders should monitor post-match official reports and FIFA’s final statistics for the exact corner count, as these are the definitive sources for settlement. No further announcements, line-up changes, or suspensions apply, since the match has ended. The settlement window closing on 26 June at 20:00 UTC confirms the market is now a record of a completed event, not a forecast[1][7]. For accurate data, refer to the official FIFA match report or ESPN’s game analysis, which provide the full breakdown of match events including corners[2][4].

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.