Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via World Cup 2026 Favorites) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set Handicap +/-2.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill | 100% |
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 1 Winner | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 3 Winner | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 2 Winner | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 3 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 3 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 3 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 4 Winner | 50% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 4 O/U 8.5 | 50% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 4 O/U 9.5 | 50% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 4 O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Match O/U 36.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Match O/U 38.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Match O/U 40.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Total Sets: O/U 3.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill Total Sets: O/U 4.5 | 0% |
Market context
The underlying event is Rafael Jodar’s first-round Wimbledon ATP match against Felix Gill, scheduled for 29 June 2026 at 6:00 AM ET. With the crowd-implied probability at 100% YES for Jodar advancing, the market treats his victory as virtually certain, despite Gill’s strong recent form on grass and a 76% win rate over the last 12 months. This near-total certainty mirrors historical cases where a player’s dominant head-to-head trend or surface-specific record erased perceived risk—such as Jodar’s 9-match winning streak against British opponents, which effectively neutralises Gill’s home-ground advantage. Notably, this is their first recorded match, meaning no prior H2H bias exists, yet Jodar’s 73% win rate over the trailing year and superior 2026 calendar performance (37 wins) frame the line as rational rather than speculative.
Traders should monitor two key catalysts: Jodar’s 27-day absence from official competition, which raises questions about match sharpness, and Gill’s 2–5 grass record in 2026, which may understate his current form given his 75% win rate overall. A recent preview from predict.tennis confirms Jodar as the 76% predicted winner, citing Gill’s limited grass experience as a critical vulnerability. Watch for any pre-match injury updates or schedule changes, as a delay beyond seven days would trigger a 50–50 resolution. With the settlement window ending 6 July 2026, the market’s 100% confidence hinges entirely on Jodar completing the match without retirement or cancellation.
Methodology
Football-specific comparison page for Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill. Polymarket's live quote (Polygon order book) plus platform attributes for the three reference venues. Sports markets reward liquidity — Polymarket and Betfair are materially deeper than Kalshi (US-focused) or Manifold (play-money).
Resolution & payout
Sports markets typically settle on official final-whistle plus league confirmation. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle with a source URL per contract — usually official league data feeds or ESPN/Soccerway. Two-hour dispute window, then smart-contract payout in USDC.
FAQ
- Are prediction markets better than sports betting?
- Prediction markets tend toward tighter odds than bookmakers because they use peer-to-peer exchange rather than bookmaker margin. On major matches, Polymarket quotes typically sit 2-5% closer to the true probability model than bet365 or DraftKings.
- Which sports markets are available?
- Football (soccer) dominates — Champions League, World Cup, Premier League, La Liga, Bundesliga — followed by NFL, NBA, tennis Grand Slams, Formula 1, boxing/MMA. Resolution via official league source confirmation.
- How fast do sports winnings settle?
- Once the official league outcome is logged in the UMA Oracle (typically 1-2 hours after the final whistle), Polymarket's smart contract triggers USDC payout. To your wallet within minutes.
- What's the difference between match odds and outright odds?
- Match odds cover a single game ("Bayern beats BVB"). Outright odds are long-term aggregates ("Bayern wins the league"). Outright markets have deeper liquidity; match markets have faster resolution.
- Can I import form data and lineups?
- This page shows the live Polymarket quote as an implied probability. Form data and lineups must be researched separately via sports data providers (e.g. Soccerway, ESPN, FBref) — we surface the market probability, not the sport analysis.
Trade Wimbledon ATP: Rafael Jodar vs Felix Gill on World Cup 2026 Favorites
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →